![]() This offers context for analyzing the scope and financial reality of child poverty in Canada. However, Battle does offer a valuable source for this essay, because the chapter provides a concise overview of government-funded assistance currently available to parents. A good annotated bibliography will demonstrate your knowledge of the academic conversation surrounding a topic. He could make this work stronger by drawing from others' perspectives and analyses. However, he relies too heavily on his own work he is the sole or primary author of almost half the sources in his bibliography. He outlines the NCB’s development, costs, and benefits, and laments that the Conservative government scaled it back in favour of the inferior Universal Child Care Benefit (UCCB). Battle pays particular attention to the National Child Benefit (NCB), arguing that it did not deserve to be criticized by politicians and journalists. His comparison of child poverty rates in a number of countries is a useful wake-up to anyone assuming Canadian society is doing a good job of protecting children. He outlines some fundamental assumptions supporting the belief that all society members should contribute to the upbringing of children. ![]() Ken Battle draws on a close study of government documents, as well as his own research as an extensively-published policy analyst, to explain Canadian child benefit programs. However, not all annotated bibliographies require all three components. (Eds), A question of commitment: Children's rights in Canada (pp. The below example uses MLA format throughout and includes all three components of an annotation (the summary, evaluation and mention of relevance). Child poverty: The evolution and impact of child benefits. Sample (color coding explained to the right)īattle, K.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |